Forms and Sets > Short Form 3 > Frequently Asked Questions > Should the elbow of Twirling Wings travel on a circular or a linear path?

The standard answer to this question is made from the perspective of category completion and the definition of an American Kenpo form, that everything has a reverse and opposite and to give an example of this. From that point of view the answer is a circular path of travel.

This answer is based upon the fact that this elbow is a missing piece of categorical information between Long Form Two and Circling Wings (Short Form Three). In this context, Circling Wing is the matching vertical version of the elbow maneuver. Thus, Circling Wings and Twirling Wings are opposites - i.e., vertical and horizontal versions of categorically connected elbow maneuvers. This is also one factor of how the techniques got their respective names.

But, there is another perspective one may interpret the forms from - correct physical motion. From this point of view, the answer is a linear path of travel. This comes from the fact that the alignment for an inward elbow, in this situation, would be improved if delivered as a straight line - i.e., like a straight punch (cut-off at the elbow). In this situation, the circular path might not have the proper back-up mass and bracing angle (depending upon delivery angle), and instead would rely heavily upon torque and speed to be effective.

Also, relating back to the first point of view (category completion), one could potentially argue that the straight path of travel also displays the opposite path of travel (circle vs line) demonstrated in Circling Wing; and thus is the correct path of travel.

Finally, as compelling point of reference to determining an answer, the ideal maneuver within the form was originally created to be executed on a circular path.

But, because one has to decide on which assessment of the maneuver they wish to follow, and each has a compelling point of view, this guide has taken a neutral stance on making a definitive answer to this question. Therefore, it is left up to the reader to make a final decision on how they wish to deliver the elbow.

One suggested way to handle this situation is to understand this situation, the ramifications for each choice, along with the associated perspective; and execute the delivery of the elbow on either path of travel at will; based upon how you wish to demonstrate a specific vantage point at that time.

As an instructor, one is presented with a prime teaching situation. One can use this question in helping (a) student(s) understand the options and implications of each decision, while eliciting conversation and understanding about this paradox. Helping the student(s) come to their own conclusion(s) in a thoughtful and purposeful manner, rather than just mimicking and not understanding the "why".

But the more interesting, and thought provoking, point to make about the analysis of this question is that there are situations like this in the American Kenpo system. Situations where Mr. Parker may have made a decision based upon a specific point of view, but an equal, and opposite point of view is just as valid. This question just goes to further prove the above mentioned adage of reverses and opposites - if one seeks out the information.