<< Click to Display Table of Contents >> Navigation:  Forms and Sets > Form 4 > Variations > Specific Variations > Isolation Sequence #2 - Transition to Defensive Cross

This variation is generally considered destructive.

 

The transitional maneuver from isolation sequence #1 to Defensive Cross is changed. This variation is accomplished by executing the downward universal block with the hands open. This variation basically comes down to an argument of an emphasis on economy of motion and simplicity over theme and realism.

 

Rationale For

The rationale for this variation is to simplify the transitional maneuver by removing the open-to-closed-to-open sequence by just leaving the hands open for the entire transitional sequence. Execution with the hands open provides less complexity to the maneuver and facilitates a quicker transition into the first maneuver (pull) of the technique from the isolation sequence (double downward heel-palms). This elimination of extra motion would then more closely follow the principle of economy of motion while also being simpler to execute. Finally, the fingers of the hands should be pointed upward during the blocking portion of the sequence and therefore should not be in danger of being injured.

 

Rationale Against

the rationale against this variation is that executing the maneuver in this manner is complimentary to the opposite (single) maneuver for the blocking sequence of the self-defense technique Darting Leaves, which starts the block with hand(s) closed then concludes with the hand(s) open during its execution. Secondarily, closing of the hands is more realistic in nature than blocking with the hands open and also removes the fingers entirely as a potential area of concern for self-injury.