Detail

<< Click to Display Table of Contents >>

Navigation:  Forms and Sets > Long Form 3 > Analysis >

Detail

When looked at as a whole, it is fair to say that Long Form Three is a fairly complex piece of work. So, with any undertaking of analysis of a complex unit, one must seriously consider the detail at which the analysis will cover. In the analysis of the lower forms (i.e., Short Form One through Long Form Two), the final analytical result could be considered so comprehensive as to leave very little out. This comprehensiveness was done purposely, with one goal being to illustrate the amount of information that is contained in relatively simple forms. But as the book series progresses, some liberties are taken in the overall analysis of the higher forms (i.e., Short / Long Form Two - where noted) for the sake of making the final work comprehensive, yet still reasonable in length.

 

This same approach will be taken with the analysis of Long Form Three. The analysis of this form will be designed to be used in conjunction with the analysis presented of the lower forms. And, since Long Form Three is designed to be an extended version of Short Form Three, many of the details of Short Form Three would be a direct overlap into Long Form Three. Because of this, the analysis of Long Form Three will specifically be designed to not repeat a considerable amount of the analysis presented in Short Form Three. Rather, it will attempt to look at the analysis from a slightly different point of view, with more emphasis on the conceptual and therefore less on the physical. This does not mean there will not be physical details, only that the concentration of information will be more skewed toward the conceptual, when compared to Short Form Three's analysis.

 

The design of this overall detail is to make the analysis as a combined unit relatively more complete without bogging the information down with minutia that would lengthen the breakdown for each section, and without adding any substantive value or becoming very repetitive. To this aim, when the reader is presented the term 'major' or 'primary' in any section, this is an indication that repetitive, fairly minor, and/or mundane details will be purposely omitted from that area of analysis. This approach leaves the final analysis within a single book of the series less than 100% complete, but it does allow for the reader of the series to get a more comprehensive understanding of different aspects of analysis when the series as a whole is considered. This also allows each book of the series to be more easily referenced and read, while also providing the reader with a more analytical progression of analysis as the series itself progresses.