Reverse / Opposite Analysis

<< Click to Display Table of Contents >>

Navigation:  Forms and Sets > Long Form 2 > Analysis of Long Form Two >

Reverse / Opposite Analysis

yin-yang

 

This section will cover the analysis of Long Form Two from the perspective of reverses and opposites. Since one of the major purposes of an American Kenpo form is to demonstrate reverses and opposites, a section on just this information is warranted. But, before continuing forward into this section an overview of what constitutes a reverse as opposed to an opposite is needed.

Reverse

Reverses tend to be more physically oriented and precise than an opposite. This typically manifests itself in a form in a much more limited way than an opposite. A reverse is typically directly related to physical direction and/or sequence order.

 

Examples of reverse directions are:

travel on a 12:00 / 6:00 path vs travel on a 6:00 / 12:00 path

movement directly forward vs directly backward

clockwise rotation vs counter-clockwise rotation

 

Sequence order deals with multiple maneuvers. Examples of reverse sequence order are:

block / punch vs punch / block (i.e. 1 / 2 vs 2 / 1)

block / punch / kick / vs kick / punch / block (i.e. 1 / 2 / 3 vs 3 / 2 / 1)

 

Things to keep in mind when determining whether something is a reverse are:

reverses are more precise in nature than opposites

reverses tend to be physical not conceptual

all reverse are opposites, but not all opposites are reverses

 

Examples of things that may appear to be reverses, but under closer scrutiny clearly aren't are:

travel on a 12:00 / 6:00 path vs travel on a 1:30 / 7:30 path

diagonally upward vs straight ahead travel

1 / 2 / 3 vs 1 / 3 / 2 sequence change

block / punch vs punch / strike

Opposite

Opposites tend to be more conceptually oriented than a reverse. This typically manifests itself in a form in a very broad way and can be derived from any number of perspectives. Something that is not determined to be an opposite from one perspective may be determined to be, if looked at from another perspective. For example; a two-finger poke is not an opposite of a four-finger poke, by itself. But if one poke is oriented (rotated) vertically and the other is oriented (rotated) horizontally, or if one poke is from the left hand and other poke is from the right hand - they would qualify as opposites. This would be from the perspective of plane orientation or body side, rather than from the perspective of point(s) of contact or opening / closing of a weapon.

 

Examples of opposite categories are:

Side - left vs right / top vs bottom

Intention - defense vs offense

(general) Direction - in vs out / up vs down / forward vs backward

Contact Point - top vs bottom / front vs back / any opposite side

Orientation - palm up vs palm down

Plane - horizontal vs vertical

Weapon Configuration - open vs closed

Weapon Range - close vs far

Travel Surface Exposure - Path of Travel (length) vs Line of Travel (tip)

Sophistication - simple vs sophisticated

Weapon Hardness - hard (contact point) vs soft (contact point)

Travel Path - circle vs line

Method of Execution - snapping vs thrusting / hammering vs thrusting

 

Things to keep in mind when determining whether something is an opposite is:

opposites must be diametrically opposed (i.e. extremes of one another)

'degrees of' are not opposites (i.e. fully closed vs partially open)

all reverses are opposites and can coexist in both categories

always look at the comparison from different perspectives

 

Examples of things that may appear to be opposites, but under closer scrutiny clearly aren't are:

'degrees of' - such as: rotation / open

Zone - top vs middle / middle vs bottom

Number of contact points (with fingers - i.e. 1 vs 4)

Method of Execution - whipping vs snapping

 

Notes

The analysis in this section does not illustrate the perspective from which the determination of reverse / opposite was derived. That information is purposely left up to the reader to resolve.

 

The analysis in this section is limited to only the information contained in Short / Long Form Two and Short / Long Form One. It does not include information from future forms.